One can assert that something is of 3 in nature, but because it can be reduced by perception to 1 it remains questionable as to the truth of its quality: In otherwords it might be best to assert that as it can be percieved by any number of divisions (perhaps one should just say vision) Ultimatley it may be fair to consider the ultimate with regards to various divisional aspects such as to most clearly arrive at a conclusion, but one I think should recognize that while one can divide it into 3 things as a whole it must still be one thing: in otherwords it may only be possible to assert that there is one that can be percieved in any number of ways.

Respond